Half-baked Sketches
Feature Article | Literary Criticism & Culture
“ When publication arrives before craftsmanship, a literary culture pays the price. This essay asks why so much contemporary Sindhi writing leans on recycled love stories, hurried language and easy applause, how weak reading and vanishing criticism let mediocrity settle in, and what writers, readers, critics and publishers can do about it. ”
Too much Sindhi writing today drags itself through repetitive, uninspired love stories. The same tired trope returns again and again: a doomed romance in which the woman is painted as the villain, her choices dissected, her voice silenced, and her character blamed as the root of every misfortune.
Sindhi literature has a proud inheritance, from the layered verse of Shah Abdul Latif to the modern voice of Sheikh Ayaz, and it still has gifted writers today. That is exactly why the present habits deserve to be examined honestly. Too many writers cling to familiar clichés that lack creativity and basic literary care. The questions remain: how did we arrive at a place where banality is so comfortable? Why do so many reach for the lowest-hanging fruit?
Language is often sloppy, riddled with errors and at times barely coherent. Plots are flimsy sketches that stumble from one predictable point to the next. Characters are flat: impossibly virtuous heroes beside cartoonishly wicked villains, with no complexity to make either believable. Dialogue frequently reads as if it were scraped together from awkwardly translated soap operas, without rhythm, wit or authenticity. And in poetry, free verse is too often treated as permission to skip thought and effort, while the occasional attempts at form lack discipline.
The Comfort of Applause
Many writers seem to feel that a few hastily written lines entitle them to stand beside literary giants such as Hemingway, Faulkner or Joyce. Those giants spent years learning their craft and rewrote relentlessly. Meanwhile, the slightest critique is treated as a personal attack, and public indignation drowns out the voices of genuine criticism. It is a performance as predictable as the stories themselves: loud, defensive and fruitless.
Facebook has become the unofficial publishing house of Sindhi writers. It is a wonderfully democratic space, and it has opened doors for many who would never have been heard otherwise. But it has side effects. Work is posted unedited, with a fanfare of self-congratulation, and the comments arrive on cue: waah, lajawaab, behtareen. Whether the piece is polished or an unedited rant, the praise is identical.
Why It Happens
What lies at the heart of this decline? For one, a culture of instant gratification: applause without effort, praise without merit. Social platforms have, for many, replaced literary forums where honest, informed feedback once lived, and shallow flattery can pass for constructive response. The cultural and intellectual isolation of a minority-language community also limits exposure to global literary movements, which can trap writers in familiar forms and ideas.
This is not only a failure of individual writers. It is a shared failure of the literary community. Publishers, and I write this as someone in that trade, sometimes release work that is not ready. Readers can accept mediocrity as the norm. Critics may shy away from the honest words that could spur change.
Criticism Is Not an Insult
A healthy literary culture needs critics, and it needs writers brave enough to listen. The difference between the two kinds of response is simple.
The Road to Revival
So where do we go from here? First, writers must put down their pens now and then and pick up books. Reading widely and deeply is not optional; it is the foundation of good writing. Writers must engage with ideas, forms and styles beyond their immediate surroundings. Writing workshops and mentorship programmes should be revived, so that aspiring authors receive guidance and honest feedback.
The literary community must also create an environment where criticism is encouraged, not shunned. Social media is a useful tool for sharing work, but it cannot replace the slow process of editing, revising and honing a text. Writers should aim to produce work that survives scrutiny rather than settling for a quick burst of validation.
Everyone Has a Part to Play
The time for excuses is over. Sindhi literature is not beyond saving, but its revival demands effort, honesty and humility. Writers must rise above their egos, readers must raise their expectations, and critics must stop pandering to mediocrity. It is time to rediscover storytelling, not as a self-congratulatory act but as a craft that reflects the richness of human experience.
Feature Article | Literary Criticism & Culture
Sindhi literary culture, criticism and the discipline of craft
Editorial Note
References and further study
Barthes, Roland. Writing Degree Zero. Translated by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” Horizon, April 1946.
Kundera, Milan. The Art of the Novel. Translated by Linda Asher. New York: Grove Press, 1988.
Adorno, Theodor W. “Cultural Criticism and Society.” In Prisms, translated by Samuel and Shierry Weber, 17–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
Eliot, T. S. “The Function of Criticism.” In Selected Essays. London: Faber and Faber, 1932.
Schimmel, Annemarie. Sindhi Literature. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1974.
Comments